Yesterday at JALT National Conference in Tsukuba I presented something about how I worked with my students in the last presentation skills course I taught. I often had students isolate interesting/key data points from charts and tables and revisualise them in better, more salient ways, usually with pens and paper.
Also, weirdly for me, I used Keynote for my slides. I don’t hate them, but I prefer my usual template.
The slides are here. Some graphs are deliberately bad, because they should be compared with better graphs.
On 14th October I presented a poster based on my PhD research with Prof. Carolyn Blume, who sadly couldn’t make it to the conference. I got a lot of very interesting feedback.
This was my first actual poster presentation that I had given, and I hope that I used the principles in Zen Faulkes’ book Better Posters well.
Here is the poster if you are interested in reading it.
I am currently working on a short teaching-related article for university teachers – and I thought I could park some example screenshots here, regarding my use of Jamboard, which is going to be killed off by Google. However, all is not lost, because not only are there other alternatives available, such as Padlet, and if you have work in person, you can also use physical blackboards and whiteboards.
Anyway, I set up the Jamboard and got them to select their top three choices. I told them I would try to accommodate their first choices if possible but it depended on how many people chose different topics out of the 36 students in the class.
Just an example of the way I used the Jamboard, not the students’ actual Jamboard.
It worked well, and it’s somewhat painless. It took me about 10 minutes to group students, and they were all satisfied with the groupings.
As I mentioned above, this could all be done with a physical board and sticky notes, too.
The next stages are that students manage their projects with elements of Agile management and Scrum meetings, inspired by Rebecca Pope-Ruark’s book Agile Faculty.
2022 was a year that felt like ten years crammed into one. It was my first wholly face-to-face year since I started at my current job (the year before was lots of on-campus and off-campus). I found two good pieces of software through Mastodon, and thought I would share them with the two people who read this (and their dogs).
Obsidian: notes with tags
Obsidian is now one of the most often used applications on my computers. I use it to take notes and also write documents that do not need to be shared with co-authors, editors or supervisors. The notes are taggable, and can be visualised in a web similar to spider diagrams. Additionally, when the header system and list system are used, parts that are not being edited right at that moment can be hidden away and brought back very easily. The files are eminently transferable between devices. I choose to not sync but purposefully move data between devices for data protection and also utility. Some devices do not need all my notes, such as my novel in progress does not need to be on my phone or my work PC. Also, getting into Obsidian Markdown has helped me with learning R Markdown considerably. I still feel that I have barely scratched the surface but it is very useful.
The graph view is not very linked on my home PC. But I am at home because I was ill. I might change this image tomorrow when I get to my work PC.
Espanso
I seem to use Espanso more often than I think. The main useful interface is text documents in which one adds text short cuts. An example might be:
:hw
which may then suddenly change to:
Hello world!
It works well, is uncomplicated and allows for subject specific lists to be added. I use a mainly limited feature set but I am very impressed so far. I have a couple of very nascent additions to the Espanso base file, but feel free to use them (these are very much works in progress, and I am unlikely to update them on here). They are text documents, but you can open them and ‘Save as’ and give them a .yml extension.
Today I was contacted by someone from an EdTech company. It’s unsurprising, seeing as I am a very online person.
I think they were trying to be earnest when they asked ‘what is the most boring, frustrating or tedious task when writing materials?’
In my reply, which possibly seems snarkier than intended, I wrote:
Nothing is tedious or frustrating. If there is anything boring, it is likely to be boring for students. Anything that is frustrating is normally due to software formatting problems. The materials writing process is not really something that can be automated, because if it were, the only possible responses would be automated. In that case, there is no point in having teachers or students in classes, and we could have two neural nets talk to one another.
If this is an area that your company has identified as a niche market, I urge it to reconsider. There is already a ton of material out there, more than can plausibly be used.
I know that somebody is likely to disagree, and that the disagreement likely stems from a different teaching approach. That is fine, I guess. But if you have a bunch of PPP drills and it’s tedious for you to come up with them, then it is highly likely that your students are going to feel the same.
As of today, my article with Carolyn Blume from TU Dortmund is available in the special issue of TESL-EJ on Global Englishes and translanguaging. It is open-access so it is available for free.
We used TED talks as online self-study, with one group watching talks by speakers of prestige varieties of English (so-called ‘native speakers’) and one group watching speakers outside of these prestige varieties.
The title says it all: there were no real differences between groups. Somewhat worryingly, neither group made gains in vowel learning, which was what we were intending they learned. Both were the same, although a limitation could be learners cramming at the last minute. However, this is something students do!
The article is here, and check out the whole of the special issue while you are there.
I gave a presentation at JALT Listening Conference (self-embargoed because I intend to sort it out as a paper for my PhD), but I talked about it in a short interview with Chris from Lost In Citations. There are a lot of other fantastic people interviewed talking about listening research, so you should check it out, seeing as you are probably interested in listening.
